San Francisco Mayor and 3$bill
Here is an open reply to 3$bill who defended the Mayor of San Francisco in reference to the Bad street conditions of SF.
3$bill claims the problem stems from the lack of funds from the Federal Government. Not the Mayor. Well the Mayor is responsible to get those funds, thru what means he can. Connecting with our two Senators, etc. Yet, he is too busy trying to look "pretty"!! And has little experience being a Politician. Odd, the former Mayor had no problems getting funds. just takle a look at the hugh transformation of the city during the last 8 years.
And their is the Board of Supervisors !! Another waste !! Especially the one who represents the Tenderlion and downtown area.
Wonder if 3$bill is just taken back with the "pretty boy" look of the Mayor??
3$bill claims the problem stems from the lack of funds from the Federal Government. Not the Mayor. Well the Mayor is responsible to get those funds, thru what means he can. Connecting with our two Senators, etc. Yet, he is too busy trying to look "pretty"!! And has little experience being a Politician. Odd, the former Mayor had no problems getting funds. just takle a look at the hugh transformation of the city during the last 8 years.
And their is the Board of Supervisors !! Another waste !! Especially the one who represents the Tenderlion and downtown area.
Wonder if 3$bill is just taken back with the "pretty boy" look of the Mayor??
posted by PrestigeRide at 5:56 PM
2 Comments:
To Jon,
Yes the old Mayor had no problems getting funding, the President then was a DEMOCRAT, and we were in a prosperity bubble and that bubble BURST with the dot. com bust, and that President was not cutting budgets to fund an ILLEGAL WAR and INVASION! Giving tax cuts to the rich and sending our jobs overseas. Even with the help of our Senators if there is NO MONEY IN FEDERAL BUDGET FOR SAN FRANCISCO ROADS OR THE STATE BUDGET FOR THAT MATTER what can our mayor do, except raise taxes, impose road tax use fees, increase taxi and linmo permit fees, property taxes etc. to make up the difference. Would you agree to that. BTW can you even vote in SF?
TomB
We need an amendment to the Constitution. To be eligible to vote, you must be 18. On election day, you must also pass a test on how local, state, and federal government works. If you fail this test (and 71% of registered voters *would* fail), then the little old ladies at the Election Board will ask you one question: How would you have voted? After obtaining your answer, they would cast a ballot (let's call that the flaming idiot ballot) for the other side. That way, stupid people are punished for having no clue how their government works, their non-vote goes against them, and everyone wins. :)
Post a Comment
<< Home